Preparing SMILES Strings For Downstream Applications

by Corin Wagen · Oct 3, 2025

The SMILES format is one of the most common ways to represent molecules in large chemical libraries. One challenge associated with storing molecules in SMILES format is that different tautomers and protonation states all have different SMILES representations, although these strings all represent the same fundamental chemical species. For modeling solution-phase properties like solubility, toxicity, or binding affinity, scientists typically prefer to use the SMILES that best represents the actual protonation state and tautomer of the compound in solution.

Unfortunately, identifying the precise protonation state of a molecule can be challenging to accomplish at scale. While SMILES strings can easily be converted into the "canonical" SMILES form in the RDKit, the canonical SMILES doesn't necessarily represent what will actually be in solution. For instance, the canonical SMILES for trimethylamine is CN(C)C, while the species which will predominate at pH 7.4 is the protonated microstate C[NH+](C)C. Correctly identifying this SMILES string in a black-box fashion requires determining the relative acidity and basicity of various sites, a complex and non-trivial challenge which cheminformatics packages like the RDKit don't attempt to solve.

Rowan's macroscopic pKa workflow provides a simple and robust way to automatically convert molecules to the protonation state and tautomer predicted to predominate at a given pH. Here's a simple Python script that uses Rowan's API to convert a SMILES string into the preferred protonation state:

import rowan

# Set ROWAN_API_KEY environment variable to your API key or set rowan.api_key directly
# rowan.api_key = "rowan-sk..."

def get_best_microstate(smiles: str, target_ph: float=7.4) -> str:
    """
    Converts a given input SMILES string to the most populated microstate at a given pH.

    :param smiles: the input SMILES string
    :param target_ph: the pH at which to assess microstate distribution
    :returns: the SMILES of the microstate
    """

    result = rowan.submit_macropka_workflow(
        initial_smiles=smiles,
        name="example macropka",
    )

    result.wait_for_result().fetch_latest(in_place=True)

    for ph, microstate_weights in result.data["microstate_weights_by_pH"]:
        if abs(target_ph - ph) < 0.01:
            ms = result.data["microstates"][microstate_weights.index(max(microstate_weights))]
            return ms["smiles"]


print(f"best microstate is {get_best_microstate('CN(C)C')}")

As expected, running the above Python script quickly returns:

best microstate is C[NH+](C)C

For small to medium-sized molecules, each macro-pKa calculation takes approximately 20 seconds (or 0.3 credits on Rowan). This is fast enough that this workflow can be run on thousands or tens of thousands of molecules, letting scientists quickly run these calculations before initializing a docking screen or training an ML model.

Rowan's macroscopic pKa workflow is available to all subscribers. If your work requires studying large numbers of molecules under physiological conditions, consider subscribing to Rowan or reaching out about a plan for your organization! We'd love to partner with you and support your science.

Banner background image

What to Read Next

Ion Mobility, Batch Docking, Strain, Flow-Matching Conformer Generation, and MSA

Ion Mobility, Batch Docking, Strain, Flow-Matching Conformer Generation, and MSA

a diverse litany of new features: ion-mobility mass spectrometry; high-throughput docking with QVina; a standalone strain workflow; Lyrebird, a new conformer-generation model; and standalone MSAs
Nov 5, 2025 · Corin Wagen, Ari Wagen, Eli Mann, and Spencer Schneider
Using Securely Generated MSAs to Run Boltz-2 and Chai-1

Using Securely Generated MSAs to Run Boltz-2 and Chai-1

Example scripts showing how Boltz-2 and Chai-1 can be run using MSA data from Rowan's MSA workflow.
Nov 5, 2025 · Spencer Schneider and Ari Wagen
Lyrebird: Molecular Conformer Ensemble Generation

Lyrebird: Molecular Conformer Ensemble Generation

Rowan's new flow-matching conformer-generation model, with benchmarks.
Nov 5, 2025 · Eli Mann
Predicting Ion-Mobility Mass Spectra Through Rowan

Predicting Ion-Mobility Mass Spectra Through Rowan

An introduction to the field, how Rowan's approach works, and where it might be useful.
Nov 5, 2025 · Corin Wagen
BREAKING: BoltzGen Now Live on Rowan

BREAKING: BoltzGen Now Live on Rowan

a new foray into generative protein-binder design; what makes BoltzGen different; experimental validation; democratizing tools; running BoltzGen on Rowan
Oct 27, 2025 · Corin Wagen, Ari Wagen, and Spencer Schneider
The "Charlotte's Web" of Density-Functional Theory

The "Charlotte's Web" of Density-Functional Theory

A layman's guide to cutting your way through the web of DFT functionals, explaining GGAs, mGGAs, hybrids, range-separated hybrids, double hybrids, and dispersion corrections.
Oct 27, 2025 · Jonathon Vandezande
How to Design Protein Binders with BoltzGen

How to Design Protein Binders with BoltzGen

Step-by-step guides on how to run the BoltzGen model locally and through Rowan's computational-chemistry platform.
Oct 27, 2025 · Corin Wagen and Ari Wagen
Pose-Analysis Molecular Dynamics and Non-Aqueous pKa

Pose-Analysis Molecular Dynamics and Non-Aqueous pKa

what to do after docking/co-folding; Rowan's approach to short MD simulations; what's next for SBDD and MD; new ML microscopic pKa models
Oct 23, 2025 · Corin Wagen, Ari Wagen, Eli Mann, and Spencer Schneider
How to Predict pKa

How to Predict pKa

Five different theoretical approaches for acidity modeling and when you should use each one.
Oct 16, 2025 · Corin Wagen
Structure-Based Drug Design Updates

Structure-Based Drug Design Updates

enforcing stereochemistry; refining co-folding poses; running PoseBusters everywhere; computing strain for co-folding; PDB sequence input; 3D visualization of 2D scans
Oct 14, 2025 · Ari Wagen and Corin Wagen